Philo’s Role as a Platonist in Alexandria
On the question of the indestructibility of the universe Gersonides pushed Maimonides 's sympathy for this view to the point of making it a philosophical-scientific truth. Contrary to Aristotle, he argued that even though the universe had a beginning it does not have an end. Contrary to Maimonides, he claimed that the indestructibility of the universe does not depend upon God's will, but is a necessary fact. For to suggest that God could destroy the universe if He so chooses is to suggest that God could have a good reason for this choice.
Numéros en texte intégral
But, he argues, God can have no such reason! Here the Leibnizian overtone is evident. Gersonides was most original in his criticism of the traditional doctrine of creation ex nihilo, a thesis that was defended or preferred by almost all of the medieval creationists. To Gersonides this doctrine was absurd; he therefore formulated a revised Platonic theory of creation out of primordial matter, removing the objections levelled by Aristotle against Plato's version of this idea.
The Father of the Christian Platonists of Cambridge
Throughout his discussion of these and of the many other topics in Gersonides's philosophy Touati evinces complete mastery of the difficult Hebrew text and of the relevant philosophical literature. Moreover, his philosophical judgment is usually sound and insightful. This is indeed a major contribution to the literature of medieval philosophy. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum, Finn Marks 20 This fascinating study deals with the changing interpretation of Plato through the centuries.
Perhaps more than any other Western philosopher, Plato has been subjected to a vast number of different interpretations and viewpoints. This may at first glance seem somewhat puzzling, since we still possess in an integral form all of the genuine works of Plato known in antiquity in addition to a number of spurious ones. One reason that such a variety of differing interpretations has arisen is, of course, due to the richness, subtlety, and inconclusiveness of the writings themselves. Another reason, however, lies in the fact that, according to a long tradition, there existed in antiquity an "esoteric" or oral teaching of Plato, which was not set down in the written works.
This gave rise to a variety of different types of Platonism, often only marginally related to the written works. Thus, strongly theological and mystical interpretations of Platonism arose in antiquity and have continued to have appeal down to the present day. Tigerstedt's study covers the period from the consolidation of the Platonic School in antiquity down to the time of Hegel and Schleiermacher.
- CAMBRIDGE PLATONISTS.
- Plato’s Aesthetics?
- iOS 9 SDK Development Creating iPhone and iPad Apps with Swift?
Table of Contents. Related Content.
Author: Peter Manchester. Using that comparison as a bridge, this book seeks a phenomenological recovery of Greek thought about time. Author: John Magee. This volume provides the first critical edition of Boethius' De divisione. The importance of Boethius' treatise is twofold: it was widely read in the medieval schools, and it preserves the only known vestiges of Porphyry's commentary on Plato's Sophist and of Andronicus' treatise on diaeresis. The book is in four main sections: prolegomena in three parts, dealing with the date, source s , and text of De divisione ; critical text with apparatus and English translation; detailed philological and philosophical commentary; appendix, bibliography, and word index.
This is the first edition of De divisione based on the earliest extant manuscripts, and the first complete commentary in any modern language. It will be of particular interest to students of later ancient and medieval philosophy and literature. Author: A. For more than years it has been supposed that Aristotle viewed the soul as the entelechy of the visible body which is 'equipped with organs'.
This book argues that in actual fact he saw the soul as the entelechy of a natural body 'that serves as its instrument'. This correction puts paid to W. Jaeger's hypothesis of a three-phase development in Aristotle.
hukusyuu-mobile.com/wp-content/jailbreaking/4154-best-cell-tracker.php The author of this book defends the unity of Aristotle's philosophy of living nature in De anima, in the biological treatises, and in the lost dialogues. Aristotle should therefore be regarded as the author of the notion of the 'vehicle of the soul' and of a 'non-Platonic' dualism. The current understanding of his influence on Hellenistic philosophy needs to change accordingly.
Related Truth and tradition in Plato and the Cambridge Platonists
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved